Nuevo registro del murciélago pálido Phylloderma stenops (Phyllostomidae); en el valle alto del río Magdalena, Colombia

, ,

Se reporta un nuevo registro del murciélago pálido (Phylloderma stenops Peters, 1865) para Colombia, en el valle alto del río Magdalena, departamento de Tolima. Este registro extiende la distribución geográfica conocida para la especie en el país, adicionando el ecosistema Bosque Seco Tropical (BST) a los hábitats ocupados por P. stenops. Debido a su rareza, se discute la información disponible sobre esta especie en el país en términos de su distribución y ecología, a partir de ejemplares en colecciones y reportes existentes. Se confirma que la especie es localmente rara, a pesar de su amplia distribución geográfica en el país y en la región.

New record of the pale-faced bat Phylloderma stenops (Phyllostomidae) in the high valley of the Río Magdalena, Colombia. A new report of the pale-faced bat Phylloderma stenops Peters, 1865) from the upper valley of the Magdalena River, in the Department of Tolima, is presented. This record extends the known geographic range of the species in Colombia, and adds the Tropical Dry Forest as a habitat for P. stenops. Because of its rarity, the available information on the distribution and ecology of the species is discussed based on existing specimens and reports. Clearly, the species is locally rare, despite its widespread distribution in Colombia and the region.

Rarity in primates: implications for conservation

A rare species contains a small absolute number of individuals, and theoretical and empirical ecologists have provided quantitative approaches to the study of differential species abundance (e.g., Preston, 1962 a, b; Gaston, 1994). The studies show that rare species are more “extinction prone” because they are more vulnerable to demographic, genetic, environmental, or catastrophic perturbations (e.g., mortality, inbreeding, habitat fragmentation, or drought, respectively). These perturbations cause “imbalances” of varying intensities, durations, frequencies, and rates which may cause population numbers to fluctuate below thresholds required for recovery. Some authors have defined and analyzed three domains of rarity: a “within-habitat” domain (alpha-rarity) (e.g., population density); a “between-habitat” domain (beta-rarity) (e.g., the number of different habitats occupied by a local population); and, a “geographic” domain (gamma-rarity) (e.g., the areal range of a species). It has been argued that species may be “extinction prone” because they occur in one or more domain of rarity and that causes of extinction may be multidimensional. These factors were studied in the Primate Order employing a subset of 97 species extracted from Wolfheim (1983). Trophic patterns for each dimension of rarity and for their combinations were also studied and found to vary from domain to domain. The broad habitat specificity of the Order implies that most species are distributed across a mosaic of edaphic and phytogeographic areas, responding with differential “norms of reaction” to stimulus patterns as they occur within and between populations. The conservation implications of the observed patterns are discussed, and a “signature” may be identified whereby Primates, broad habitat specialists, appear to display an association between endemism and low differentiation into subspecies and races. Endemism is favored where one finds poor vagility, poor survivorship, or poor colonization, traits thought to characterize large mammals, such as Primates. The traits that predispose Primates to extinction-vulnerability are components of the dimensions of rarity and may predict those strategies most likely to maximize the preservation of primate species diversity. It is concluded that Primates will be conserved where they coexist with other fauna and flora of greater ecological significance in “hotspots” of biological activity in large reserves that are close together.